Why your business needs seal resistance stress testing?
Many people have stepped into such a pit when using proxy IPs: systems that usually run smoothly suddenly experience massive blocking during peak periods. This is often due to the fact that the business system has not beenStress testing of real scenarios, in particular the lack of bearer capacity validation of proxy IP pools.
By simulating high-frequency access scenarios for real users, we can identify three key issues in advance:
1. Upper limit of request frequency for a single IP
2. Rotational responsiveness of the IP pool
3. Stability differences between protocol types
This data will have a direct impact on the fault tolerance of the business system.
Hands-on stress testing program design
Here's a proven four-step test to share:
Phase I: Set up a basic test environment with ipipgo's Dynamic Residential IP, set a baseline of 50 requests per second
Phase II: Gradually increase the concurrency to 200 times/second, record the time point when the IP is blocked
Phase III: Repeat the test by switching static residential IPs and comparing the failure thresholds of the two
Phase IV: Use a mix of HTTP/Socks5 protocols and observe the difference in response between the different protocols
| Test metrics | Dynamic IP Performance | Static IP performance |
|---|---|---|
| Average survival time | 12-15 minutes | 8-10 minutes |
| Success rate of requests | 98.7% | 95.2% |
Reading the key metrics of the blocking rate report
There are three dimensions to focus on when you get the test data: : IPs in certain regions may have higher stability Take ipipgo's UK residential IP as an example of what was found in testing: Give specific recommended programs based on test results: The real-world case shows that a mix of dynamic IPs (701 TP3T) and static IPs (301 TP3T) can reduce the overall blocking rate from 18.71 TP3T to 6.41 TP3T. Q: Why do I always get blocked at a fixed time during testing? Q: What should I choose between dynamic and static IPs? Q: How are geographic differences in test results utilized? Through systematic stress testing and data analysis, combined with the professional proxy IP services provided by ipipgo, a protection system can be effectively built to cope with high concurrency scenarios. It is recommended to update the test program regularly (quarterly) and adjust the IP usage strategy in time.
1. Lapse time distribution: Record the time curve of each IP from activation to blocking
2. Comparison of protocol types: Differences in survival rates for different protocols with the same request volume
3. Geographical fluctuation factor
- When configurations with 3-minute rotation intervals are used
- The HTTP protocol completes an average of 1,200 requests before triggering a ban
- Socks5 protocol can be increased to 1800 times with the same configurationOptimization strategy: dynamic + static combinations
High Frequency Operation Scenarios: It is recommended to use ipipgo Dynamic Residential IP to set the automatic rotation interval to 5-8 minutes
Scenarios requiring stable sessions: Select Static Residential IP + Protocol Obfuscation Solution
Surge Traffic Response: Prepare spare nodes in advance that account for 301 TP3T of the total IP poolFrequently Asked Questions QA
A: This usually indicates that the IP rotation strategy needs to be adjusted. It is recommended that the intelligent rotation threshold be set in the ipipgo background to automatically switch nodes based on real-time response.
A: It needs to be decided according to the type of business. Dynamic IP is suitable for scenarios that require frequent replacement, while static IP is more suitable for services that need to maintain session continuity.
A: ipipgo's IP library covers 240+ countries, and it is possible to establish a geographic stability whitelist. For example, the test found that the average survival time of residential IPs in Germany is 35% longer than other regions, and you can prioritize the allocation of such resources.
English 
简体中文 
Español 
Deutsch 
Français