
Engage in data capture, grab a limited number of seconds, do real-time monitoring, slow 0.1 seconds may turn over! Proxy IP speed is your life and death line. 2025 actual testIPIPGO, Tianqi HTTP, Guangluo CloudThe response speed of the three mainstream service providers, with real data to tell you: between milliseconds, who is the real king!
I. Domestic Extreme Speed Track: Apocalypse HTTP Rides High
Test Scenario: Simulation of e-commerce rush, 50 domestic IPs initiating requests at the same time (the target server is located in Shanghai)
Apocalypse HTTP Performance:
Directly refresh the cognition! Call their short-lived dynamic IPs (from $0.005/IP) in conjunction with self-built in-country nodes:
- Average response latency: 8.2ms (official labeling ≤10ms, actual test reaches the standard)
- Interface request time: 0.7 seconds (official nominal <1 second)
- IP Availability: 99.3% (higher than the nominal 99%)
Self-constructed 200 + city server room + operator first-hand resources, the domestic delay of this piece of the pinch to death, the real speed of the monster.
Light Loop Cloud Performance:
Use domestic short-lived dynamic IP (covering 300+ cities):
- Average response delay: 25ms
- Resource Pool Intelligent Rotation Effective, No IP Failure
- Advantage in batch task management, suitable for automation scenarios that don't require extreme hand speeds
IPIPGO Performance:
Enable the Dynamic Residential (Enterprise Edition) domestic node:
- Average response latency: 82ms
- Abundant global resources, but domestic node optimization is not as good as locally-focused service providers
- Strong stability, no dropouts under high concurrency
Domestic speed ladder:
Tianqi HTTP (8.2ms) > Guangluo Cloud (25ms) > IPIPGO (82ms)
Global Relay Challenge: IPIPGO Leads Stably, Optical Cloud Intelligent Overtaking
Test Scenario: Access the servers in the United States, Japan and Germany from the Beijing node, and launch 100 requests each.
IPIPGO Performance:
The advantages of globally distributed clusters are highlighted:
- Average latency of US nodes: 142ms
- Average latency of Japanese nodes: 89ms
- Average German node latency: 156ms
- Minimal fluctuation range (±10ms), optimal global access stability, suitable for multi-region balanced operations
Light Loop Cloud Performance:
Intelligent scheduling engines take credit:
- Average latency of US nodes: 138ms (slightly better than IPIPGO)
- Average latency of Japanese nodes: 85ms (slightly better than IPIPGO)
- Average node latency in Germany: 162ms
- Fast first hop response, but occasional fluctuations over long distances (±25ms)
CN2/BGP backbone network + intelligent route optimization, outstanding performance in short and medium distance
Apocalypse HTTP Performance:
- International nodes non-core operations with high latency (average 210ms+ in the US)
- Focusing domestically is a smart choice
Global Speed Ladder (General):
Short range (Asia): Kouluo Cloud (85ms) ≈ IPIPGO (89ms) > SkyQuest HTTP (210ms+)
Long distance (Europe and America): IPIPGO (142-156ms) > Guangluoyun (138-162ms) > Tianqi HTTP
Intelligent scheduling track: the optical cloud AI black technology to make an impact
Test Scenario: Using SERP API to continuously crawl Google search results (1000 requests/minute)
Kourokuun crushes the board:
Its SERP API + AI behavioral simulation technology implementation:
- Average request response: 45ms (millisecond capture in name only)
- Success rate: 98.7% (close to nominal 99.9%, affected by fluctuations in test target sites)
- AI dynamic simulation of user behavior, effectively reducing the risk of IP blocking
Billing based on successful results, invalid requests do not cost money, outstanding cost-effective
IPIPGO & Apocalypse HTTP:
- Need to build their own crawling environment + configuration of the proxy, the average response in 100-150ms
- High Frequency Requests Require Finer Anti-Blocking Strategies
- Pure proxy service, no built-in AI optimization capability
Technical speed ladder:
Kouro Cloud (45ms, AI-optimized) > IPIPGO/Apocalypse HTTP (100ms+, manual configuration required)
2025 Proxy IP Response Speed Ladder (Combined Score)
| rankings | service provider | Core Speed Advantage | Domestic delays | International delays | intelligent dispatch (computing) | Applicable Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apocalypse HTTP | Extreme low latency in China | ★★★★★ (8ms) | ★★★ (210ms+) | ★★★★ (API efficient) | Domestic rush/seconds/high-frequency operations |
| 2 | halo cloud | AI Intelligence Acceleration | ★★★★ (25ms) | ★★★★ (138ms) | ★★★★★ (AI Routing) | Cross-border data crawling / TK Live / Intelligent Tasks |
| 3 | IPIPGO | Stable transmission worldwide | ★★★★★ (82ms) | ★★★★ (142ms) | ★★★★★ (cluster stabilization) | Multi-country operations/long-term stable IP requirements |
Speed Party QA: Hardcore Answers About Latency
Q: How much difference is there in actual experience between 10ms and 100ms latency?
A: A world of difference! Take e-commerce snaps for example:
10ms latency: 100 requests can be completed in 1 second
100ms latency: only 10 requests can be completed in 1 second
With a 10x efficiency gap, it's the difference between grabbing a limited edition item and running with it.
Q: How to test the real latency of proxy IP?
A: Don't just look at service provider data! Hands-on real-world testing:
1. Test the proxy gateway base latency using the ping command
2. Record request response time (from initiation to receipt of the first byte) with the Python requests library
3. Simulation of real business scenarios (e.g., 100 concurrences)
Try all three services for free and measure the most accurately with your own environment!
Q: Why is international node latency so much higher than domestic?
A: Physical distance is hard! It takes time for data to run even faster:
Fiber optic cable transmission: Beijing to Los Angeles about 130ms (speed of light limit)
Route hopping: add 1-10ms for each router you pass through
Server processing time
IPIPGO and Optical Cloud approach the physical limits through localized node deployment and intelligent routing.
Q: Does the protocol (HTTP/SOCKS5) affect speed?
A: There is an impact but not much:
SOCKS5: Simple protocol, low overhead, slightly faster in theory by a few milliseconds
HTTP(S): need to handle encryption/headers, slightly slow
Daily use is not perceived as strong, just choose by business compatibility.
Q: Do speeds plummet at high concurrency?
A: Look at the service provider architecture! Distributed clusters (such as IPIPGO, Apocalypse HTTP) can effectively share the pressure. Be sure to simulate real concurrency when testing, low load speed test is meaningless.
There is no "all-around champion" for speed, only "scenario king": Apocalypse HTTP is a well-deserved domestic latency killer, IPIPGO provides transcontinental stable high-speed channels, and Guangluo Cloud uses AI to make intelligent scheduling to the millisecond level.2025 Select Agent The "2025" selection agent, see this ladder chart, don't let the speed drag down your business!

