Comparison of Proxy IP On-Time and Per-Volume Billing Models and Scenario Analysis

Proxy IP billing model in the end how to choose? After reading this do not spend the wrong money

Recently, a lot of friends asked me to proxy IP by the time and by the amount of billing in the end what is the difference between today's break open the rubbing said. Let's take ipipgo this old service provider as an example, after all, his family has more than 90 million real residential IP, covering more than 240 regions, the actual test protocol support is indeed full.

First, hourly billing is the gym card

Hourly billing is like a monthly gym membership.Feel free to use it for a fixed period of timeThe dynamic residential IP of ipipgo is especially suitable for this model, for example, if you want to do 24-hour uninterrupted data monitoring, choose a weekly and monthly card, the IP address will be changed regularly but the traffic is created randomly.

But watch out for a pitfall: if you actually use less time than what's included in the package, it's the equivalent of throwing money away for nothing. It's like getting an annual gym membership and only going to the shower three times, it's a losing deal.

Second, billing by volume is like sharing charging treasure

Billing by traffic/requests is like renting a rechargeable battery.Use as much or as little as you like.The static IP pool of ipipgo is deep and especially suitable for this kind of scenario. For example, to do market research, just three times a day to capture the data, this kind of sporadic tasks to choose the traffic package is the most cost-effective.

But you have to keep an eye on your usage not to go over the limit, it's the same as borrowing a rechargeable battery and forgetting to return it. If you suddenly have a big project and the traffic runs up, the bill may hurt you.

Third, choose the right model can save half the budget

I have an e-commerce friend who bought a time-based package month after month and later realized that the actual usage was less than 1/3 of the package. after switching to ipipgo's per-volume billing+dynamic IP combo, I found that the actual usage of the package was less than 1/3 of the package.Costs cut right down to 60%The key is to find out how you use it. The key has to be figuring out your usage patterns, like cutting back to on-time billing during the double 11 sale to not delay things.

IV. Quick questions and answers to frequently asked questions

Q: Will I be cut off if I have to increase the volume temporarily?
A: ipipgo has a flexible mode, according to the time package with more than automatically switch to the amount, with the cell phone traffic package, this design is quite humane.

Q: Can I mix the two modes?
A: His background can be opened at the same time by the time and by the amount of the project, such as the main business with the time, temporary tasks go by the amount, but remember to separate business line management.

Q: How do I pick a bargain during the testing phase?
A: First use their free test quota, it is recommended to test the actual consumption of both modes at the same time. There is a trick: choose the test time in the peak business period, so that the data is more accurate.

Fifth, choose the service provider to see these doorways

Lastly, I'd like to say that you can't just compare prices when choosing a proxy IP service provider. Like ipipgo, which covers more than 240 countries, friends doing cross-border e-commerce use it smoothly. In particular, some niche areas of static IP, others simply can not get together the resource pool. Plus the protocol support, SOCKS5 and HTTPs are fully equipped to deal with a variety of strange systems.

In short, there is no absolute good or bad billing model, the key has to beGetting to know your own business temperamentThe first thing you need to do is to get your hands on a free test number from ipipgo. It is recommended that newbies run a free test number with ipipgo for a few days to get a feel for the traffic peaks and valleys before choosing a package, which is the most prudent.